Law School and ABI Law Review Mark 20th Anniversary of Hon. Conrad B. Duberstein Moot Court Competition

March 15, 2012



On Monday, March 12, 2012, nearly 1,000 bankruptcy judges, professionals and law students gathered at Pier 60, Chelsea Piers, in Manhattan to celebrate the 20th anniversary of the ABI’s annual Hon. Conrad B. Duberstein Bankruptcy Moot Court Competition. A fitting close to the three-day competition, the Gala Dinner featured an award presentation by the Bankruptcy Judges for the Southern District of New to retiring Chief Bankruptcy Judge Hon. Arthur J. Gonzalez, recognizing his service to the Bankruptcy Court.

Now the largest single-site appellate moot court competition, the Duberstein Competition is sponsored by St. John’s School of Law and the American Bankruptcy Institute (ABI). It is named for distinguished St. John’s alumnus and former ABI Director, Chief Judge Conrad B. Duberstein, who passed away in 2005 at the age of 90. Law students from the Law School’s ABI Law Review and Moot Court Honor Society volunteer to help organize and manage the event.

A record 54 teams from 39 schools around the country participated in this year’s competition. A team from the University of Texas School of Law took first place and a $5000 prize, while teams from Stetson University College of Law made an impressive showing by placing second and tying for third with the team from the University of Florida Fredric G. Levin College of Law. The second and third place teams received $3000 and $1500, respectively. In addition, the University of Florida team won a $1,000 award for the Best Brief and Hunter Oliver, a student at the Baylor University School of Law, won the $1,000 Best Oral Advocate award. All the monetary prizes were provided through the generosity of The ABI Endowment Fund.

Nearly 200 lawyers and judges ― including Bankruptcy Judges from the New York area and around the nation― helped judge the competition, which included eight rounds of arguments. The final rounds were held at the Conrad Duberstein United States Bankruptcy Courthouse in Brooklyn. The final round was judged by a panel of distinguished federal jurists that included:

  • Hon. Jeffrey S. Sutton, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
  • Hon. Bernice B. Donald, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
  • Hon. Carla E. Craig, Chief Judge of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, E.D.N.Y.
  • Hon. Arthur J. Gonzalez, former Chief Judge of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, S.D.N.Y.

Each year, the competition problem focuses on two sophisticated cutting edge issues of bankruptcy law. Past competitions addressed environmental clean up costs, channeling injunctions in mass tort cases, state sovereign immunity, the constitutionality of the bankruptcy courts, religious entity bankruptcies and the constitutionality of speech restrictions imposed on consumer bankruptcy attorneys, to name just a few of the problem topics.

This year’s problem again raised two timely unresolved issues of bankruptcy law: (1) whether an innocent trade vendor who supplies post-petition to the debtor on a C.O.D. basis must return the payments under section 549 if the debtor’s use of funds to pay the vendor exceeds the scope of the cash collateral order; and (2) whether the Supreme Court’s decision in Stern v. Marshall deprives the bankruptcy court of the power to hear and determine the section 549 action. The fact pattern can be accessed via the 2012 Competition website.