Areas of Program Development

Research Literacy
Forms the basis for lifelong learning.  It is common to all disciplines, to all learning environments and to all levels of education.  IT enables learners to master content and extend their investigations, become more self-directed, and assume greater control over their own learning.  An information literate individual is able to:

  • Determine the extent of information needed
  • Access the needed information effectively and efficiently
  • Evaluate information and its sources critically
  • Incorporate selected information into one’s knowledge base
  • Use information effectively to accomplish a specific purpose
  • Understand the economic, legal and social issues surrounding the use of information, and access and use of information ethically and legally

Research literacy, while showing significant overlap with information technology skills, is a distinct and broader area of competence.  Increasingly, information technology skills are interwoven with, and support, research literacy.

Information Fluency
Using critical thinking skills and appropriate technologies, information fluency integrates the abilities to:

  • Collect the information necessary to consider a problem or issue
  • Employ critical thinking skills in the evaluation and analysis of the information and its sources
  • Formulate logical conclusions and present those conclusions in an appropriate and effective way

Information Fluency may be envisioned as the optimal outcome when critical thinking skills are combined with information literacy and relevant computing skills.

Computer Literacy
Rote learning of specific hardware and software applications.

Technology Fluency
Fluency with technology focuses on understanding the underlying concepts of technology and applying problem-solving and critical thinking to using technology.  Information technology fluency focuses on a deep understanding of technology and graduated increasingly skilled use of it.

Problem-Based Learning
A contextualized approach to teaching where the instructor serves as a facilitator, and students engage in individual and group research to solve problems with multiple solutions.  Having its origins in medical education, PBL is often compared to case-based instruction, though its use of case studies is often more open-ended.  PBL offers the students the flexibility and leeway to construct their own approaches and solutions as the instructor adopts the role of guide, tutor, and evaluator rather than the traditional lecturer.  A key difference in PBL education is that students are taught ways of accessing resources for research, instead of being given a specific set of required resources.  PBL encourages interdisciplinary research, team participation skills, self-directed learning, and student-student and teacher-student interaction as students assume increasing responsibility for their learning.

Critical Thinking
In contrast to traditional methods of passive learning requiring rote memorization, critical thinking can imply a number of activities where students conceptualize, apply, analyze, synthesize and evaluate information.  Critical thinking is a self-reflective process that requires the ongoing assessment and evaluation of one’s own thinking process.  Often critical thinking will imply a healthy skepticism as rejecting, or suspending judgment.  Solving problems, fashioning inferences, and calculating likelihoods are all associated with critical thinking, as is examining and testing possible solutions to see if they work.

Critical Pedagogy
In opposition to the “banking concept” of education, what Paulo Freire called the traditional manner by which teachers seek to “deposit” information into their students’ heads for later withdrawal, critical pedagogy drives students to examine social, political, and economic contradictions within their fields of study, so that ultimately student might have the necessary critical tools to study and promote social justice.  Freire’s answer was a problem-posing teaching, where students and teachers are co-investigators in a mutual dialogue.