Direct and Indirect Assessment

Select methods or instruments for gathering evidence to show whether students have achieved the expected learning outcomes related to program or course goals. Methods of assessment will vary depending on the learning outcome(s) to be measured.

Following is a partial list of examples:

Direct Measures
(Students demonstrate an expected learning outcome)

Scoring Rubrics: can be used to holistically score any product or performance such as essays, portfolios, recitals, oral exams, research reports, etc.  A detailed scoring rubric that delineates criteria used to discriminate among levels is developed and used for scoring.

Capstone Courses: could be a senior seminar or designated assessment course.  Program learning outcomes can be integrated into assignments. Performance expectations should be made explicit prior to obtaining results

Case Studies: involve a systematic inquiry into a specific phenomenon, e.g. individual, event, program, or process.  Data are collected via multiple methods often utilizing both qualitative and quantitative approaches.

Embedded Questions to Assignments: Questions related to program learning outcomes are embedded within course exams.  For example, all sections of “research methods” could include a question or set of questions relating to your program learning outcomes.  Faculty score and grade the exams as usual and then copy exam questions and scores that are linked to the program learning outcomes for analysis.  The findings are reported in the aggregate.

Standardized Achievement Tests: Select standardized tests that are aligned to your specific program learning outcomes.  Score, compile, and analyze data.  Develop local norms to track achievement across time and use national norms to see how your students compare to those on other campuses.

Locally developed exams with objective questions: Faculty create an objective exam that is aligned with program learning outcomes.  Performance expectations should be made explicit prior to obtaining results.

Locally developed essay questions: Faculty develop essay questions that align with program learning outcomes.  Performance expectations should be made explicit prior to obtaining results

Reflective Essays: generally are brief (five to ten minutes) essays on topics related to identified learning outcomes, although they may be longer when assigned as homework.  Students are asked to reflect on a selected issue.  Content analysis is used to analyze results. Performance expectations should be made explicit prior to obtaining results

Collective Portfolios: Faculty assemble samples of student work from various classes and use the “collective” to assess specific program learning outcomes.  Portfolios can be assessed by using scoring rubrics; expectations should be clarified before portfolios are examined.

Observations: can be of any social phenomenon, such as student presentations, students working in the library, or interactions at student help desks.  Observations can be recorded as a narrative or in a highly structured format, such as a checklist, and they should be focused on specific program objectives.

Indirect Measures of Student Learning
(Students or others report their perception of how well a given learning outcome has been achieved)

Standardized Self-Report Surveys: Select standardized tests that are aligned to your specific program learning outcomes.  Score, compile, and analyze data.  Develop local norms to track achievement across time and use national norms to see how your students compare to those on other campuses.

Focus Groups: are a series of carefully planned discussions among homogeneous groups of 6-10 respondents who are asked a carefully constructed series of open-ended questions about their beliefs, attitudes, and experiences.  The session is typically recorded and later the recording is transcribed for analysis.  The data is studied for major issues and reoccurring themes along with representative comments.

Exit Interviews: Students leaving the University, generally graduating students are interviewed or surveyed to obtain feedback.  Data obtained can address strengths and weaknesses of an institution or program and/or to assess relevant concepts, theories or skills.

Interviews: are conversations or direct questioning with an individual or group of people.  The interviews can be conducted in person or on the telephone.  The length of an interview can vary from 20 minutes to over an hour.  Interviewers should be trained to follow agreed-upon procedures (protocols).

Surveys: are commonly used with open-ended and closed-ended questions.  Closed-ended Questions require respondents to answer the question from a provided list of responses.  Typically, the list is a progressive scale, ranging from low to high or strongly agree to strongly disagree.

Classroom Assessment: is often designed for individual faculty who wish to improve their teaching of a specific course.  Data collected can be analyzed to assess student learning outcomes for a program.


Adapted from work done by Allen, Mary; Noel, Richard C.; Rienzi, Beth M.; and McMillin, Daniel J. (2002).  Outcomes Assessment Handbook, California State University, Institute for Teaching and Learning, Long Beach, CA. and the APA Task Force on Undergraduate Psychology Major Competencies.