Electronic Resources: Selection Guidelines

 In support of the Library's "Going Digital" policy, we are actively acquiring Electronic Resources whenever appropriate. Among these are online databases, e-journals, e-books, and electronic government documents.

Cooperative collection development:

  • Collaborate with WALDO and other consortia to obtain the best mix of Electronic resources at the most favorable term, in order to best serve the Saint John's community.

Overlap with other Electronic Resources

  • Materials should not significantly duplicate the contents of other database subscriptions. The Library must consider the increase in coverage versus the costs incurred.

Community Served by Electronic Resources

  • Intellectual level of material and depth of coverage consistent with the needs of St. John's undergraduates, graduate students,  faculty, and administration.
  • Ease of search, and suitability of search methodology for an academic environment.

 Technical and Service Concerns

  • Vendor reputation and performance.
  • Timeliness of updates.
  • Compatibility with Library hardware and software.
  • Remote access for authorized  users both on and off campus.
  • Availability of various file formats, i.e. html, PDF, or Excel (for statistical data) 
  • Interoperability with bibliographic utilities such as RefMan or Endnotes.
  • Support for collaborative learning.
  • Ability to customize search or other session preferences, and save information between sessions.
  • Ability to save selected materials to storage devices and to print selected materials.
  • Restrictions (if any) on multiple users.
  • Requirements for proprietary or special software, individual accounts, or individual passwords.
  • Ability to integrate with online Library catalog or other databases. Ease of removal if subscription is cancelled.
  • Copyright and licensing restrictions.
  • Provisions for adding or removing individual  items as required to the subscription.
  • Web usage statistics and reporting tools that conform to ICOLC standards.
  • Provisions for long term ownership of archival copies.
  • Adequacy of online help or other documentation. Availability of technical support.
  • Need for staff assistance and training.

Relationship to Materials in Other Formats

  • Will Electronic Resources duplicate, replace or supplement print sources?
  • Do Electronic Resources reflect the excellence, comprehensiveness, and authoritativeness expected of materials in other formats?
  • Are the same materials available electronically from other aggregators or publishers?

The following Selection Criteria apply to all formats, and should also be considered when evaluating Electronic Resources

  • Appropriateness for use in St. John's programs.
  • Level of St. John's program in the subject area (doctoral, graduate, or undergraduate).
  • Currency and timeliness of the material.
  • Format of the material, with emphasis on electronic formats whenever appropriate.
  • Lasting or scholarly value of the material.
  • Author's qualifications and reputation.
  • Authority and reputation of the publisher.
  • High standards of quality in content, format, and/or literary merit.
  • Favorable review in a professional journal.
  • Gaps in the collection in the subject area.
  • Language.
  • Appropriate format for subject area.
  • Budgetary consideration and price.
  • Access vs. ownership rights.