Selected Publications

Articles and Book Chapters
“Trinko: A Kinder, Gentler Approach to Dominant Firm Behavior Under the Antitrust Laws,” 59 Maine Law Review (Forthcoming) (link)

“The FTAIA and Empagran: What Next?” 58 Southern Methodist University Law Review 1419 (Fall 2005) ( link)

“Antitrust Remedies Revisited,” 84 Oregon Law Review 147 (Spring 2005) ( link)

“Illinois Brick: A Look Back and a Look Ahead,” 17 Loyola Consumer Law Review 1 (2004) ( link)

“The FTAIA and Subject Matter Jurisdiction Over Foreign Transactions Under the Antitrust Laws: The New Frontier in Antitrust Litigation,” 56 Southern Methodist University Law Review 2151 (Fall 2003)

“De-Regulation of the Air Waves: Is Antitrust Enough?” 17 St. John’s Journal of Legal Commentary 67 (Winter 2003)

“Pleading Rules in Antitrust Cases: A Return to Fact Pleading?” 21 Texas Review of Litigation 1 (2001) ( link)

“Reciprocal Dealing: A Rebirth?” 75 St. John’s Law Review 633 (Fall 2001)

“Antitrust Litigation” in Business and Commercial Litigation in Federal Courts (West) (2000) (link)

Editor, St. John's Faculty Issue, 72 New York State Bar Journal (October 2000) ( link)

“New York Antitrust Bureau Pursues Mandate to Represent State Interests in Fostering Competitive Environment,” 72 New York State Bar Journal 38 (January 2000) ( link)

“The Bernstein Lectures: A Forward,” 74 St. John’s Law Review 303 (Spring 2000)

“Kumho Tire Decision Extends Daubert Approach to All Expert Testimony,” 71 New York State Bar Journal 9 (July/August 1999)

“A Model for Using Magistrate Judges to Help Mitigate Delay in Federal District Courts,” 37 Judges’ Journal 68 (Spring 1998) (link)

“Antitrust Liability Premised,” 6 University of Miami Business Law Journal 119 (Spring 1997)

“The Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 and the 1993 Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: Can Systematic Ills Afflicting the Federal Courts Be Remedied by Local Rules?” 67 St. John’s Law Review 721 (Fall 1993)

“Antitrust in the Second Circuit,” 65 St. John’s Law Review 795 (Summer 1991)

“Attorneys’ Fees in Antitrust Litigation: Making the System Fairer,” 57 Fordham Law Review 51 (October 1998)

“The Relevance of Administrative Considerations in the Judicial Decisionmaking Process: A Kantian Perspective,” 11 Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 407 (Spring 1998)

“Contribution, Claim Reduction, and Individual Treble Damage Responsibility: Which Path to Reform of Antitrust Remedies?” 40 Vanderbilt Law Review 1277 (November 1987)

“Detrebling Antitrust Damages: An Idea Whose Time Has Come?” 61 Tulane Law Review 777 (March 1987)

“Developing Standards Under Amended Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,” 14 Hofstra Law Review 499 (Spring 1986)

Other Publications
“Plead a Little: The Supreme Court Should Not Raise Pleading Standards For Antitrust” in the Legal Times (November 2006)

“Some Frank Discussion About a Confused Issue: Mandatory Disclosure and Complex Antitrust Litigation,” 8 Antitrust 8 (Summer 1994) (Cover Story)

“Preparing a Witness to Testify in a Commercial Case,” 18 Litigation 36 (Summer 1992)

Paper Presentations and Selected Speaking Engagements
American Bar Association Antitrust Section, Committee on Civil Practice and Procedure (2001-2002) (Chairperson)

"The New Antitrust Paradigm,” American Bar Association Antitrust Section Annual Meeting (2000) (Moderator and Speaker)

"Request for Admissions Under FRCP 36,” American Law Institute/American Bar Association Antitrust Section Mid-Winter Program (2000) (Speaker)

Edward D. Cavanagh