Academic Fairness Procedures

Introduction
A grade at the School of Law is generally based on a final written examination. There exist certain policies and practices which are intended to reinforce student confidence in the fairness of the examination process and student understanding of the course material:
  • All final examinations are graded anonymously and students are assigned new anonymous grading numbers for each semester.
  • Upon request of the student, a faculty member provides an individual review of essay answers for any student with a D or an F grade.
  • At the request of class representatives, a faculty member conducts a general examination review for the class.

Subject Matter
The Faculty of the School of Law recognizes that the evaluation of academic performance necessarily involves the exercise of judgment by a faculty member. Accordingly, this Academic Fairness Procedure is available only to consider a student’s claim that a faculty member has graded that student in an unfair manner and on a basis other than evaluation of the student’s academic performance.

Procedure

  1. If a student wishes to invoke this Academic Fairness Procedure, the student must, within thirty days of the date of the mailing of the grade mailer containing the grade in question, give notice of the particular complaint to and consult with the
    faculty member concerned. Such time limitation may be extended by the Committee on Grades for good cause shown.
  2. If the complaint is not resolved to the satisfaction of the student within seven days from the date of consultation with the faculty member, and the student wishes to pursue this Academic Fairness Procedure, the student must within seven days thereafter bring the complaint to the attention of the Dean. Upon request of the faculty member the Dean shall require the student to reduce the complaint to writing. The Dean shall attempt to resolve the complaint informally in consultation with the student and the faculty member.
  3. If the complaint is not resolved through such informal consultation within seven days after it has been brought to the Dean’s attention, and the student wishes to pursue the complaint, the student may do so in writing to the Chairman of the Committee on Grades and the faculty member concerned.
  4. The Committee on Grades shall convene within seven days of such submission to consider the complaint. The student shall have the burden of establishing by a fair preponderance of the credible evidence that the faculty member has graded that student in an unfair manner and on a basis other than evaluation of the student’s academic performance.
  5. The Committee on Grades shall determine the procedures to be followed. All procedures shall be designed and construed to afford substantial justice to all parties. All proceedings before the Committee on Grades shall be private and confidential.
  6. If the faculty member concerned is a member of the Committee on Grades, the Dean shall appoint a replacement from the faculty.
  7. Failure of the student to pursue this Academic Fairness Procedure, once invoked, will be deemed a withdrawal of the complaint with prejudice.
  8. The Committee on Grades is authorized to provide any appropriate academic remedy, and its determination shall be final.

Apply Now >