Race, Culture, Class and Crisis in Child Welfare: Theory into Practice Symposium

School of Law Hosts Child Welfare Symposium

On November 17, 2007, distinguished scholars and practitioners from diverse disciplines gathered at St. John’s University School of Law for a day-long examination of the child welfare system.  Titled Race, Culture, Class, and Crisis in Child Welfare: Theory into Practice, the symposium featured expert dialogue designed to raise awareness of the bearing that race, culture, and class have on the child welfare system, and to explore alternatives for improving child welfare.  The symposium was hosted by the School of Law’s Child Advocacy Clinic and supported by a grant from the U.S. Department of Justice.  Papers from the symposium will be published in the St. John’s Law Review.

In her remarks opening the symposium, Theresa Hughes, Director of the Child Advocacy Clinic, noted that St. John’s is situated in the most culturally diverse place on the planet: Queens County, New York, where within just 109 square miles live over 2 million people who speak 138 different languages.  And although child maltreatment is a phenomenon familiar to all ethnic groups, she went on to say, people of color are considerably overrepresented in the child welfare system.  Throughout her remarks, which were accompanied by a five-minute video, Prof. Hughes stressed the importance of the voices of the children in directing the course for improving the child welfare system. 

In the Child Advocacy Clinic, St. John's law students represent children who are the victims of child maltreatment in New York State Family Court.  The student appear in court pursuant to a student practice order and work under the close supervision of the School of Law's clinic faculty.  The Clinic takes a multidisciplinary approach to advocacy, working with partners from the University’s departments of psychology, counseling and human services, and fine arts.

Keynote Address

The Keynote Address was delivered by Barbara Bennett Woodhouse, the David H. Levin Chair in Family Law and Director of the Center on Children and Families at the University of Florida Fredric G. Levin College of Law.  In a lecture titled Race, Culture, Class and the Myth of Crisis: Child Welfare from an Ecogenerist Perspective, Professor Woodhouse explained that the pernicious effect of poverty (and therefore race) on the welfare of children is not a “crisis,” but rather a deeply entrenched status quo.  Real change, Professor Woodhouse argued, is possible only if we look beyond “the personal and the systemic to the environmental and weigh the long term social costs of ignoring the environmental risks of poverty and racism,” suggesting that family supports and prevention need to be the foundation of the system.

Theory into Practice

In the morning panel, which was moderated by Rosemary C. Salomone, Kenneth Wang Professor of Law at St. John’s, four distinguished academics discussed the theoretical implications of race, culture, and class for the child welfare system.  Professor Twila Perry of Rutgers School of Law, discussed the racial divide surrounding trans-racial adoption.  Martin Guggenheim, the Fiorello Laguardia Professor of Clinical Law at New York University School of Law, posed the question of whether our society embraces a “robust” child welfare system, antagonistic to our values, simply to proclaim to others our love and commitment to children.   Susan Mangold, Vice Dean for Academic Affairs and Professor at the University of Buffalo Law School, challenged the audience to think about ways to consider the structure of the laws surrounding child welfare.  Sandra Azar, Professor of Clinical Psychology at Penn State, summarized research into the cognitive components of cross-cultural human interactions in the child welfare system.

In the afternoon, the discussion turned from theory to practice.  Three of the afternoon speakers were public officials directly involved in the operation of the child welfare system.  Janet DiFiore, the Westchester County District Attorney, discussed the law enforcement response to child abuse and neglect, emphasizing that the modern prosecutor’s office must be “proactive and holistic” rather than merely “reactive.”  John Mattingly, the Commissioner of New York City’s Administration for Children’s Services, and Kevin Ryan, the Commissioner of New Jersey’s Department of Children and Families, described the efforts that their agencies are making to ensure that children are protected and that families are supported in all communities.  Rounding out the afternoon panel, Dr. Lisa Aronson Fontes, author of Child Abuse and Culture: Working with Diverse Families, discussed the crucial role of language and interpreters in the child welfare system, and Professor Peter Margulies of Roger Williams University School of Law discussed the challenges facing lawyers who represent children in the system.

In concluding remarks, School of Law Professor Elaine Chiu noted that one of the goals of the symposium was to bring together a diverse group of academics and practitioners so that “we can learn from each other.”  To that end, the symposium was a great success.

Contact Information

For more information about the symposium or about the Child Advocacy Clinic, contact Professor Theresa Hughes at (718) 990-2937 or hughest@stjohns.edu.

 

Apply Now >