Almerinda Forte

Business Ethics and the Moral Reasoning of Individual Managers

Almerinda Forte, Division of Administration and Economics, College of Professional Studies

Abstract
Business ethics, especially among top managers, has become a topic of concern to the public and business community. As a result, much attention has focused on the development of moral reasoning in corporate individuals. Past research examining individual and business decision behavior, indicates that organizational-level variables have a significant impact on individual decisions. Since managers’ decisions impact organizational goals and organizational ethical behavior, this researcher investigated the degree to which there are differences in the moral reasoning ability of business managers of selected industries and whether there are significant differences between top, middle, and first-line management levels.

To determine the relationship between managers’ locus of control and their moral reasoning ability, this study considered three independent variables: reported organizational ethical climate, locus of control and selected demographic and institutional variables. For a foundation, this researcher relied on Kohlberg’s theory of moral development, Victor and Cullen’s ethical work climate theory, and Rotter’s theory of internal-external locus of control (which evolved from Carl Jung). The short form of Rest’s DIT instrument measured the moral reasoning abilities of the participants. The selected demographic and institutional variables (age, work tenure, education, gender, management level and industry category) provided the useful information to investigate these relationships of moral reasoning ability of individual managers.

A survey questionnaire was sent to 400 managerial and executive level companies at a random sample of Fortune 500 firms throughout the United States. Dun and Bradstreet provided the researcher with a proportional stratified random sample of those 400 managerial and executive level employees at a variety of organizations. The researcher received 214 usable, completed surveys, which resulted in a response rate of 55%. The researcher conducted statistical analysis utilizing SPSS Base 9.0 for Windows, and Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient ®, two tail t-tests, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple regression analysis.

The researcher found a number of statistically significant relationships. For instance, a statistically significant relationship between age and organizational ethical climate types (Caring, Law and Code, Rule, Instrumental and Independence) was found as well as a statistically significant relationship between management levels and organizational ethical climate. In addition, other statistically significant relationships were revealed, including that between the manufacturing industry’s “P” scores and the service industry’s “P” scores, tenure and ethical climate types, education and ethical climate types, and selected demographics (industry types and gender) and moral reasoning.