NIH Seeks St. John’s Professor’s Advice on Correcting Racial Disparities in Research Grants

December 01, 2011

After discovering racial disparities among scientists awarded government funding, the National Institutes for Health (NIH) invited a St. John’s University psychology professor to join the distinguished researchers proposing ways to improve the representation of minority researchers who ultimately receive grants.

Scyatta Wallace, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Psychology, made her presentation at an advisory meeting held by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, a division of the NIH. The meeting took place over two days, November 7 and 8, in Bethesda, MD.

“The NIH is dedicated to eliminating disparities in health and human services,” said Dr. Wallace. “So the agency was dismayed to see these disparities among the researchers who are actually investigating these issues. The NIH wants to decrease those disparities as well.”

The racial imbalance was revealed in an August 19 article published in Science magazine. The study — “Race, Ethnicity and NIH Research Awards,” by Donna Ginther, et al.— was commissioned by the NIH itself.

Correcting an Imbalance
According to the study, university-affiliated Ph.D. scientists from minority backgrounds who applied for NIH grants between 2002 and 2006 were far less likely to receive awards than their white counterparts. Applications by African-American scientists were rejected more often than any other group.

Since 2008, Dr. Wallace has served on a variety of NIH committees that review grant applications. She was chosen to serve because she received grants herself. “It’s important for applicants to know how the process for awarding grants actually works,” said Dr. Wallace.

“For one thing,” she continued, “I suggested that we have NIH representatives go to the universities, to educate researchers, and students who may become researchers, about the process.”

Another suggestion Dr. Wallace made involves educating the scholars who review grant applications. This is especially true in terms of scholars who are unfamiliar with the value of teaching-intensive universities and their mission.

“At times there is a bias in favor of grant applications from scholars affiliated with research-one universities,” said Dr. Wallace. Yet many underrepresented scholars are drawn to teaching-intensive institutions. “Those are the colleges and universities that tend to focus on the needs of minorities, immigrants, first-generation students. And those are the very communities that are most challenged in terms of health services.”

Focusing on Those in Need
Dr. Wallace has dedicated much of her personal research to understanding the health challenges facing diverse communities. She has studied the way neighborhood and socio-cultural norms affect HIV risk among young, urban African-Americans. Her work also explores the use of culturally tailored interventions to promote health among young African Americans.

In addition, the media often seek Dr. Wallace’s comments on the relationship between racial stereotypes and self-image. For example, she is quoted in a December 2011 Essence article on the difficulties dark- and light-skinned African-American women face within their communities as well as white society.

Dr. Wallace is optimistic about the NIH effort to improve minority representation among grant recipients. An NIH report will be developed based on the presentations and feedback provided by Dr. Wallace and other scientists at the meeting.  The report will provide recommendations to inform NIH policy. At a time when minority communities urgently need improved health services, said Dr. Wallace, closing the racial gap in awarding grants may help.

“If we want to address health care in particular community,” she noted, “we need to know the cultural reasons why people may not be inclined, say, to go to the doctor. I can make a very good case for awarding grants to researchers who would ask those questions.”