Faculty Application of SCE

A Tool for Assessing and Improving Instruction

Fall 2007 marked the inauguration of the course evaluation online at St. John's University which replaced the former SIR II paper version.  The new course evaluation form was developed by a committee of St. John’s faculty members and comprised 26-scaled and three open-ended questions.  Moreover, instructors had the option of adding as many as five of their own questions, unlike the paper-based SIR II, which could not be customized. 

Overall, 2,145 undergraduate classes and 31,641 student responses were included in the fall course evaluation, generating a student response rate of 58%.  At the graduate level, 329 classes and 3,681 student responses produced an even higher student response rate of 66%. The student response rate for the University as a whole was 59%.

After the results were sent to faculty in December, they were surveyed on the course evaluation; over three hundred responded. In their comments, many faculty noted that receiving the analysis of the results so quickly enabled them to consider their students’ feedback in time to modify their course or teaching technique for the spring semester. This is a distinct advantage over the SIR II paper version, the findings of which took months to analyze and disseminate to faculty.

Many ideas on utilizing the findings were reflected in the responses.  A sample of actual quotes appears below:

  • "I will change the way we set up work groups. Students loved the small groups, but some thought we should rotate the members every few weeks. I'll try that next time."
  • "I plan more one on one and small group interactions with students. "
  • "The students gave constructive suggestions on how to incorporate special projects and group work."
  • "Well, my colleagues and I shared our results so that we could incorporate students' thoughts into the next course in our sequence. They gave us valuable insight on using Blackboard/WebtCT."
  • "Students identified specific aspects regarding the use of technology that I will try to improve in the future."
  • "Students indicate that class discussion is very useful, and I plan to develop this method, along with some other suggestions like images in PowerPoint, more short films, etc.."